Bridging the gap between CCIE RS and SP

May 14, 2010

INE ospf traffic engineering challenge

Filed under: CCIE, Mini Labs, dynagen, dynamips — 21500 @ 11:38 pm

While browsing blogs, when I should be labbing, I came across INE’s OSPF Traffic Engineering challenge. I normally ignore these because I happen to see them when they usually already expired. Well this one somehow managed to pull me in. Petr has a very valid point, most often real network challenges are fixed with the first, quick and easy solution (or future problem). I know if this was a scenario in our network, static routes would definitely be the prime candidate.

My summarized version of the answer to Petr’s challenge is to use multiple ‘logical’ interfaces or in other words multiple subinterfaces, using only loopbacks for addressing or ip unnumbered loopback, since configuring additional ip addresses were not permitted. After the subinterfaces were configured all what was left to do is then manipulating the ospf cost on the R4-R1 link to 3 and set the maximum ospf paths. The net result: 6 paths to a subnet on R1, 3 going via R1, 2 paths via R3 and 1 path via R5:

Routing entry for 100.100.100.0/24
Known via “ospf 1″, distance 110, metric 4, type intra area
Last update from 3.3.3.3 on Serial1/0.1, 00:00:01 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 5.5.5.5, from 1.1.1.1, 00:00:01 ago, via Serial1/3
Route metric is 4, traffic share count is 1
3.3.3.3, from 1.1.1.1, 00:00:01 ago, via Serial1/0.1
Route metric is 4, traffic share count is 1
3.3.3.3, from 1.1.1.1, 00:00:01 ago, via Serial1/0.2
Route metric is 4, traffic share count is 1
1.1.1.1, from 1.1.1.1, 00:00:01 ago, via Serial1/1.2
Route metric is 4, traffic share count is 1
1.1.1.1, from 1.1.1.1, 00:00:01 ago, via Serial1/1.1
Route metric is 4, traffic share count is 1
1.1.1.1, from 1.1.1.1, 00:00:01 ago, via Serial1/1.3
Route metric is 4, traffic share count is 1

The topology from URL above:

I fumbled a quick dynamips config together.

autostart=false

####################
# http://21500.net #
####################

[localhost:7200]

[[3725]]
image = /dyn/images/C3725-adv-ent-mz.124-23.BIN
ram = 160
mmap = true
idlepc = 0×60a8141c

[[Router R1]]
model = 3725
console = 2001
S1/0 = R2 S1/0
S1/1 = R4 S1/1
S1/2 = R5 S1/2
F0/0 = LAN 1

[[Router R2]]
model = 3725
console = 2002
S1/1 = R3 S1/1

[[Router R3]]
model = 3725
console = 2003
S1/0 = R4 S1/0

[[Router R4]]
model = 3725
console = 2004
S1/3 = R5 S1/3

[[Router R5]]
model = 3725
console = 2005

Completed config files if you want to run this minilab and perhaps find some more ways to solve the riddle.

R1.txt
R2,txt
R3.txt
R4.txt
R5.txt

Update: And what do you know, the solution gets the prize :)

May 8, 2010

Dynamips/Dynagen NET files for IPX SP workbooks

Filed under: CCIE, CCIE SP, dynagen, dynamips — 21500 @ 6:17 pm

Another item to scratch from my “to do” list. I built them before the Vol2 and Vol3 merge and not sure what changed to the topologies if any. If you are using the post-merge workbook I ‘assume’ that you will need to switch between the two .net files depending on the lab.

Here they are:
Dynamips / Dynagen NET file for IPexpert SP workbook vol1 and vol3
Dynamips / Dynagen NET file for IPexpert SP workbook vol2

Note they were built on linux, which gave me the best results, therefore to use them on MS, you’ll need to edit the file and change the directories e.g /dyn/images/ to c:\dyn\images\

Please leave a comment if you find a bug.

May 5, 2010

SP Content manager Vincent Zhou introduces himself

Filed under: CCIE SP, Juniper — 21500 @ 7:02 pm

First, have a look at the post, some important leads are given towards future plans for the SP track, although we knew it has been coming for a long time:
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/58601

The most important bit, at least for me is:
“CCIE SP will continue to develop in line of SP industry requirement, a new version is on the way to come out. SP exam will NOT disapper in future. In a new version, SP lab will test on both IOS-XR platform and IOS platform, features like IPv6, more TE, more L3VPN, more L2VPN, more Multicast VPN, Carrier Ethernet, etc will test in the exam, please pay attention on official annoucement for detail in later, thanks.”

And interesting recent posts by Vincent:
“Actually CCIE SP has completed new version design.”

“There will have an annoucement about new SP Version 3 soon. For coming version, blueprint, test equipment and operating system will have large update. So in current version there are no plan for 360 program. And in comping new version 3.0. we wish to release 360 learning program, thanks.”

Seems that I am starting to become an advocate of the cisco learning network. I just joined the CCIE SP Study Group. I missed quite a bit of news… Dubai SP seats, SP 360 program.

Update:
“The main change are IPv6 and IOS-XR will start test in lab exam. All test equipment operating software will update to recent version, so recent SP technology will reflect in the exam. In version 3, there is no plan of seperate topology for troubleshooting section.”

Ok, from this it appears that the current hardware will still be there (“All test equipment operating software will update to recent version“). I ‘assume’ the 2600’s will move to pure CE devices where they belong and at least the bug issues (“traceback!”) will be reduced. Then it is not clear whether we will see XR hardware or emulation. Its probably more likely to be an emulator judging on the virtualization of the RS track. XR is lean on features and I dont think there is scope for big surprises :/ . There is also a possibility that XR will only be tested in OEQ, but I doubt this is the case. They want engineers to get accustomed to XR, because if you take the journey from IOS to XR, you might as well that the journey all the way to juniper. Maybe a bit harsh? Damage limitation strategy perhaps.

SP lab Switching vs Dynamips

Filed under: CCIE SP, dynagen, dynamips — 21500 @ 6:45 pm

Just a short post regarding the above, should have posted this long ago.

I often get the question or see someone asking this on the forums. “How much switching is required in the SP lab?” or “Can I prepare using only dynamips?”. The short answer is you can rely 100% on dynamips for SP preparation. If you are not comfortable with just using dynamips, you can use the breakout switch method. Although this is overkill for SP it is a nice setup for RS. I ditched the real switches in favor for the dynamips switch modules due to the noise factor.

Another thing to note is that L2 switching is pretty much completely preconfigured. See page 11 of the attached Preparing-SP-lab-part1 22Dec08 d-3927.pdf on the cisco learning network page https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-3927 to get further details.

Powered by WordPress